Monthly Archives: September 2017

Monster Fest Perth2

 

Monster Pictures’ Grant Hardie chatted to Heavy Radio’s Dave Griffiths about what the people of Perth can expect this weekend at Monster Fest Perth 2017.

Perth genre fans will get a taste of Monster Pictures’ annual Melbourne-based genre film festival Monster Fest this July thanks to the continued partnership with Event Cinemas to present MONSTER FEST TRAVELLING SIDESHOW at Event Cinemas Innaloo on September 15-17th, 2017.

MONSTER FEST TRAVELLING SIDESHOW is a mix of horror-centric highlights around the globe and will feature some select Australian and Adelaide premieres!

Opening our festival is the Perth premiere of Tyler MacIntyre’s brutally hilarious slasher TRAGEDY GIRLS, followed by the Australian Premiere of surreal sci-retro-tech horror SEQUENCE BREAK and the claustrophobic Spanish suspense-driven thriller THE GLASS COFFIN will also have its Australian Premiere. Following their acclaimed Lovecraftian feature SPRING, writer/directors Aaron Moorhead & Justin Benson’s THE ENDLESS will have its Perth Premiere, making its Australian Premiere is Colin Minihan’s zombie apocalypse game-changer IT STAINS THE SAND RED while Italian horror maestro Dario Argento’s 1977 masterpiece SUSPIRIA will celebrate its 40th anniversary with a presentation of the all-new stunning 4K restoration.

Another 4K restoration making its Perth debut is David Lynch’s TWIN PEAKS: FIRE WALK WITH ME, a window into the last seven days in the life of Laura Palmer. Australian mockumentary and recent Fantastic Fest official selection, TOP KNOT DETECTIVE will have a hometown screening along with a filmmaker Q&A. In association with Umbrella Films, we are proud to present tribute screenings to George A. Romero with the undisputed 1985 classic DAY OF THE DEAD and Tobe Hooper with THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE. 

TICKETING:
Single Session Tickets
Adult $21
Concession $17.50

5 Film Multi-Pass
Adult $82.50
Concession $71.50

10 Film VIP Pass
Adult $132
Concession $110

Make sure you grab your tickets from www.monsterfest.com.au

Trade Bait

 

Subculture Entertainment and 94.1FM’s resident football journo Dave Griffiths keeps you updated with all the 2017 AFL Trade Bait news right here.

 

CONFIRMED TRADES, DELISTINGS AND RETIREMENTS

 

ADELAIDE -

Outgoing: Scott Thompson (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

BRISBANE -

Outgoing: Josh Clayton (delisted), Jonathan Freeman (delisted), Blake Grewar (delisted), Ryan Harwood (delisted), Jarrad Jenson (delisted)

Incoming: Nil

 

CARLTON -

Outgoing: Dennis Armfield (retired), Andrew Gallucci (delisted), Daniel Gorringe (retired), Kristan Jaksch (delisted), Matthew Korcheck (retired), Liam Sumner (delisted)

Incoming: Nil

 

COLLINGWOOD -

Outgoing: Jesse White (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

ESSENDON -

Outgoing: Yestin Eades (retired), James Kelly (retired), Brent Stanton (retired), Jobe Watson (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

FREMANTLE -

Outgoing: Zac Dawson (retired), Garrick Ibbotson (retired), Shane Yarran (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

GEELONG -

Outgoing: Tom Lonergan (retired), Andrew Mackie (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

GOLD COAST -

Outgoing: Keegan Brooksby (delisted), Ryan Davis (delisted), Jarrod Grant (delisted), Mitch Hallahan (delisted), Cameron Loersch (delisted)

Incoming: Nil

 

GWS -

Outgoing: Tow Downie (retired), Steve Johnson (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

HAWTHORN -

Outgoing: Jack Fitzpatrick (retired), Josh Gibson (retired), Luke Hodge (retired), Luke Surman (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

MELBOURNE -

Outgoing: Liam Hulett (delisted), Heritier Lumumba (retired), Jake Spencer (delisted), Jack Trengrove (delisted), MitchWhite (delisted)

Incoming: Nil

 

NORTH MELBOURNE -

Outgoing: Will Fordham (delisted), Lachlan Hansen (delisted), Matthew Taylor (delisted)

Incoming: Nil

 

PORT ADELAIDE -

Outgoing: Nil

Incoming: Nil

 

RICHMOND -

Outgoing: Ivan Maric (retired), Chris Yarran (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

ST KILDA -

Outgoing: Joe Baker-Thomas (delisted),  Nick Coughlan (delisted), Sean Dempster (retired), Leigh Montagna (retired), Nick Riewoldt (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

SYDNEY -

Outgoing: Nil

Incoming: Nil

 

WEST COAST -

Outgoing: Paddy Brophy (retired), Sam Butler (retired), Sam Mitchell (retired), Drew Petrie (retired), Matt Priddis (retired)

Incoming: Nil

 

WESTERN BULLDOGS -

Outgoing: Matthew Boyd (retired), Declan Hamilton (retired), Robert Murphy (retired), Josh Prudden (delisted)

Incoming: Nil

 

Friday October 6 - NAB AFL restricted free agency offer and unrestricted free agency period begins

Monday October 9, 9am* - NAB AFL Trade Period begins

Sunday October 15, 5pm - Close of NAB AFL restricted free agency offer and unrestricted free agency period

Wednesday October 18 - NAB AFL restricted free agency matching offer three-day period ends

Thursday October 19, 2pm – NAB AFL Trade Period closes

Wednesday November 1 - NAB AFL delisted player free agency period (1) begins

Wednesday November 8 - NAB AFL delisted player free agency period (1) closes

Friday November 10 -  NAB AFL delisted player free agency period (2) begins

Friday November 17, 5pm - NAB AFL delisted player free agency period (2) closes

Friday, November 24 - NAB Draft

Saturday November 25 - NAB AFL delisted player free agency period (3) begins

Sunday November 26, 2pm - NAB AFL delisted player free agency period (3) closes

Monday November 27 - NAB AFL Pre-Season Draft & NAB Rookie Draft

Wednesday November 29, 2pm - Final AFL club list lodgement

25 Voices

Performer Jason Triggs chats to Harley Woods and Dave Griffiths from Subculture about his brand new show 25: Voices that will be held on Saturday 16th September for two very special performances as part of the 2017 Melbourne Fringe Festival.

Take a listen to the interview and Dave and Harley talk to Jason about how the show was conceived and how he learnt that he could do so many impressions.

You can listen to the interview right here – Listen to “25 Voices Subculture Special” on Spreaker.

Girls Trip

 

Summary: When four lifelong friends travel to New Orleans for the annual Essence Festival, sisterhoods are rekindled, wild sides are rediscovered, and there’s enough dancing, drinking, brawling, and romancing to make the Big Easy blush.

Year: 2017

Australian Cinema Release Date: 31st August 2017

Australian DVD Release Date: TBA

Country: USA

Director: Malcolm D. Lee

Screenwriter: Kenya Barris, Tracy Oliver, Erica Rivinoja (story)

Cast: Deborah Ayorinde (Simone), Ricky Bell (himself), Donna Biscoe (Delores), Michael Bivins (himself), Mariah Carey (herself), Morris Chestnut (himself), Kyle Clements (Officer Sims), Mike Colter (Stewart Pierce), Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs (himself), Common (himself), D-Nice (himself), Gabrielle Dennis (herself), Ronnie DeVoe (himself), Ava DuVernay (herself), Kenneth ‘Babyface’ Edmonds (himself), Aadyn Encalarde (Riley), Estelle (herself), Faith Evans (herself), Kevin Frazier (himself), Doug E. Fresh (himself), Johnny Gill (himself), Lara Grice (Bethany), Tiffany Haddish (Dina), Carla Hall (herself), Regina Hall (Ryan Pierce), Melissa Harris-Perry (herself), Lalah Hathaway (herself), Sunny Hostin (herself), Charreah Jackson (herself), Queen Latifah (Sasha Franklin), Alona Leoine (Sonya), William Levy (himself), Mase (himself), Maxwell (himself), MC Lyte (herself), Terry McMillan (herself), Robert Miano (Hobo Bob), Ne-Yo (himself), Shrey Neil (Vikram), Jaina Lee Ortiz (herself), Jannette Sepwa (Rhonda), Jada Pinkett Smith (Lisa Cooper), Kofi Siriboe (Malik), Tonia Stewart (Aunt Marian), Larenz Tate (Julian Stevens), Lorraine Toussaint (herself), Ralph Tresvant (himself), Iyanla Vanzant (herself), Kate Walsh (Elizabeth Davelli), Ricky Wayne (Ted), Cayden Williams (Austin)

Runtime: 122 mins

Classification: MA15+

OUR GIRL’S TRIP REVIEWS & RATINGS:

 

Dave Griffiths:

 

Comedies aimed at a female audience have proven to be very popular at the box office over the past few years. Some, like Bridesmaids and Pitch Perfect have been on song (excuse the pun) and worked wonderfully well. Then came Rough Night, the film that Hollywood hoped would be a female version of The Hangover, but it flops badly. Following on with that same goal we now have Girls Trip… a film that is head and shoulders above Rough Night.

In a story of friendship we meet The Flossie Possie – made up of  the world’s new Oprah, Ryan Pierce (Regina Hall – Scary Movie 4, Law Abiding Citizen), almost-bankrupt gossip columnist Sasha Franklin (Queen Latifah – Living Single, Chicago), boring divorced mother Lisa Cooper (Jada Pinkett Smith – Collateral, Scream 2) and the fun loving but very violent Dina (Tiffany Haddish – Keanu, Meet The Spartans).

The Flossie Possie started out in High School but have drifted apart over the years, but now they are back together and heading to New Oreleans where Ryan is the keynote speaker at a conference while her agent Elizabeth (Kate Walsh – Grey’s Anatomy, The Perks Of Being A Wallflower) works on a business deal that will see Ryan and her husband Stewart (Mike Colter – Luke Cage, Million Dollar Baby) become one of the richest celebrity couples in America. But with their marriage not as perfect as first seems and each of the members of the Possie dealing with their own demons this could turn out to be a very interesting weekend indeed.

As a film Girls Trip does hold up. The characters are instantly likable and for once a comedy gives you just enough back story for each of the characters to seem real, and even more importantly is there a no clichéd characters here. These important things all working with the screenplay and for director Malcolm D. Lee (Undercover Brother, The Best Man) means as an audience you find yourself barracking for these characters straight away.

What also works with the screenplay is the relationships between the characters. We get that there is tension between Sasha and Ryan without the screenplay having to spell it out in plain English for us. The script also allows for an interesting development between Ryan and Stewart by introducing his mistress, Simone (Deborah Ayorinde – Luke Cage, Game Of Silence) and then introducing a potential love interest for Ryan in the form of the almost perfect bass-player Julian (Larenz Tate – The Postman, Ray). The twisted four-way relationship never feels forced, which the screenwriters need to be congratulated about, and once again draws the audiences interest.

However, the major flaw of Girls Trip is that it feels like the screenwriters were never one hundred per cent sure what kind of comedy they were looking to make the film. There are witty lines and great moments of comedy that will make you laugh, Dina’s exchange with her boss as she is being fired is hilarious, but then when you suddenly find yourself watching a women pee on a crowd beneath her while she is on a zip line or another giving fellatio to a banana you find yourself wondering what are they trying to achieve here. These kinds of gags work in films like American Pie or The Hangover because they are constant, but there they seem out of place. Ironically it is when this film is showing moments of true heart and feelings between its characters that it works, that makes the outrageous comedic moments seem like an even stranger fit.

One of the main things that does work in favour of Girls Trip though is the performances of its cast. Everybody comes together really well and together Regina Hall, Queen Latifah, Jada Pinkett Smith and Tiffany Haddish are one of the best comedic ensembles that we have seen in quite a while. Hall brings are sensitivity to the film, Latifah brings heart and Haddish is there for the more outrageous moments. Then you have the utility – Smith who does a mixture of whatever each scene calls for. Then there is Larenz Tate who must be itching towards a headline role in a film soon, while Kate Walsh also delivers some of the film’s most funny moments.

Girls Trip does have a little issue with its comedic tone but for the most part this is a film that works pretty well. There are moments that will make you chuckle, which is more than you can say for a lot of comedies these days, while there is enough heart to win over any audience. If you’re looking for the perfect girls night out then Girls Trip should be number one on your list.

Stars(3)

 

Greg King:

 

 

Bridesmaids pretty much set the standard for the R-rated raunchy girls misbehaving comedy, and we have seen a lot of these female centric versions of The Hangover. But subsequent films in this subgenre, like the recent Rough Night, Bad Sisters and even Sex And The City 2, have continually lowered the bar. And now we get to Girls Trip, an African-American variation on the girls behaving badly formula. But this is a dreary, offensive and largely unfunny comedy which, quite frankly, scrapes the faecal matter off the bottom of the barrel.

As with Rough Night the basic plot centres around the reunion between a group of female friends who were once tight in college, twenty years ago, who get together for a wild weekend. Known as the “flossy posse” they were known for their hard partying ways. Over the course of time though they drifted apart and haven’t seen each other for five years.

Ryan (played by Regina Hall) is now a successful author and self-help guru who supposedly has it all. She is married to Stewart (Mike Colter) a former football star and is about to sign a lucrative deal to host her own nationally syndicated television talk show and book deal. She has been asked to deliver the keynote address at the annual Essence Festival in New Orleans. So, for some reason she decides to get the flossy posse back together to share in her success.

Sasha (Queen Latifah) graduated with a degree in journalism but, strapped for cash, is now reduced to writing for a low rate gossip blog. She dishes the dirt on celebrities. Lisa (Jada Pinkett Smith) is a conservative, straitlaced divorcee, a helicopter mum who tries to protect her two children. She plays it safe and leads an unadventurous life and has to be talked into going to New Orleans with her former friends. And Dina (Tiffany Haddish) is still the wild child, the sexually aggressive hard partying type who hasn’t really changed her behaviour. She is unable to hold down a job because of her brash manner and a series of wrong choices.

Once the quartet hits New Orleans the ladies cut loose. However, before too long old resentments, lingering tensions and new revelations threaten the friendship and test their bonds. Sasha learns the truth about Stewart, who has been cheating on Ryan with seductive and well-endowed Instagram model Simone (Deborah Ayinode), and she has to choose whether to publish her scoop or remain silent out of loyalty to Ryan. Dina’s wild ways get them thrown out of a luxurious five-star hotel and they find temporary accommodations in a two-dollar hooker hotel. Cue plenty of drinking, brawling, crass sexual innuendo, and some frank dialogue, but little of it rings true.

Girls Trip has been written by a trio of writers, including Erica Rivinoja, who hails from a background in television and animated films; Kenya Barris (Barbershop: The Next Cut, and lots of tv work including Blackish); and Tracy Oliver (Barbershop: The Next Cut, etc). Directed by Malcolm D Lee, better known for Barbershop: The Next Cut and Scary Movie 5, Girls Trip gets the tone wrong from the start. As with Rough Night, I found it hard to believe that a successful character like Ryan would hang out with these losers by choice, especially at such a pivotal point in her career. This is fairly formulaic stuff, with plenty of the gross out humour and crude dialogue that we have seen before.

Most of the main characters are an unlikeable bunch, and the time spent in their company is tiresome. At an overly generous 122-minutes, the film is way too long for what it wants to say. Although this ode to sisterhood delivers some positive messages about friendship, female bonding, the joys of being single in the 21st century, and staying true to yourself, we have to sit through nearly two hours of dreck to get there. The film also explores issues of race, class and gender politics.

There is some surprisingly strong chemistry between the four leads though. Girls Trip reunites Latifah and Pinkett Smith twenty years after the both appeared in the heist thriller Set It Off. Hall delivers her usual solid performance here. Latifah always has a brash style and plenty of attitude, but here she often seems uncomfortable and doesn’t exactly bring her A-game. This is a breakout performance from Haddish, who delivers a volatile and scenery chewing performance as the unpredictable Dina, and she does bring some energy to the material, and virtually steals the film.

There are also lots of star studded cameos though from celebrities playing themselves. Girls Trip is a sub-Apatow like comedy, but it is largely unfunny, with too many flat spots and many supposedly humorous moments that are misjudged. The film hits a low point with a tasteless sequence set on a flying fox over New Orleans’ famous Bourbon Street that sets a new low for this kind of comedy.

Stars(1.5)

 

 

 

Average Subculture Rating (out of 5):  Stars(2)

 

IMDB Rating:  Girls Trip (2017) on IMDb

 

Other Subculture Entertainment Girl’s Trip Reviews: You can also listen to Dave’s Girl’s Trip review from That’s Entertainment  on 31/08/2017 right here.

Trailer:

Phoenix Forgotten Poster

 

Some actors, for one reason or another, are forced to direct films outside of their personal interests or preferred genre. Have you been lucky enough to only work within the genre, and your preferred type of film?

I wouldn’t say I have a preferred genre in terms of film.  I love drama, because you have a lot of emotional rope to play with.  I love comedy because it’s so much fun -  I trained at UCB and the Groundlings and I like playing and improvising and making people laugh.  And the last few features I’ve done, Like Phoenix Forgotten, have happened to be horror films, or at least had a horror element to them.  It just worked out that way – and I also happen to be a horror fan, both as a viewer and as an actor.  I love movies like Peter Jackson’s early film Dead Alive.  Shaun of The Dead is another favorite, and  I loved this year’s Get Out and Ingrid Goes West (which I would totally describe as a horror movie though I realise that’s contentious!).  In horror movies the stakes are heightened – and that’s a really fun world for an actor to work in.  And I think the best horror movies have moments of both comedy and drama – so you get the best of both worlds.

 

How soon before filming did you get involved?

I had worked with Justin Barber (our director) and T.S. Nowlin, our writer, on some other projects prior to this one, so I was lucky enough to be involved with this movie right from the initial test shoot.  I didn’t know if the project was going to get to be made into a feature, and I wasn’t sure if I was going to be able to even audition for the role I ended up playing, there are always so many variables in the process of making a film.  Obviously in the end I did get to audition and it worked out for me! I’m very grateful I got to be a part of the film from beginning to end, that was a really special part of this experience for me.

 

How long has it been since it was completed? Was it an anxious wait for the release?

Going into this project the goal was for it to feel like you’re watching a documentary my character, Sophie, has made about her brother’s disappearance.  So we had a great script that our director Justin Barber co-wrote with our writer, TS Nowlin (who also wrote The Maze Runner Trilogy).  But going into pretty much every scene we also improvised a version of it – so it felt like real moments from real people.  This meant that the film changed a lot as we made it – because obviously in improvising you’re not planning what you’re saying, and you’re finding new stuff on the day.  In a documentary you never know exactly what you’re going to get – you shoot all your stuff and you sift through and it all comes together in the edit.  However, with a real documentary you just have to use whatever you end up with after you film – if you are making a narrative feature you get to go back and shoot anything you feel like your story is missing later on!  So we had a couple of re-shoots right up until right before the release date – I think it was a month or so.  I had already seen a couple of cuts of the film so I wasn’t anxious – just excited to see it come out.

 

Did it turn out as you envisioned it would?

Because in a way we were approaching this film as you would a documentary, that set a really high bar for our acting.  Approaching this role I felt really committed to being grounded and subtle and making sure Sophie felt three dimensional and believable.  One of the things I think is so cool about this film is that we weave fact and fiction together – there are actual real people in the film who we interview about some of their real experiences.  So personally my goal was to live up to the example set by the wonderful moments we got out of our real interview subjects.  I was lucky enough to be surrounded by a great cast and I think everyone did an amazing job – so yes, in that sense I think what came out of that is a movie that feels like the real doc my character would have made, and that’s what I had hoped for and envisioned going in.

 

Were any scenes of yours lost in the editing room? Any moments you remember filming?

My character initially had a love interest, who was the brother of one of the other kids who goes missing.  Dan still made it into the movie but he and Sophie didn’t end up getting their walk off into the sunset together -  which was the ending of an earlier edit!  Sorry Sophie!

 

How much say did you have in how the film was marketed?

I can take zero credit for that – that was not my department.

 

Do you get to approve stills that you feature in?

I think so?  That wasn’t a huge issue for me on this one.

 

Have you been lucky enough to work with a filmmaker that involves you in the entire process – right up until release?

Well this project was an especially collaborative one.  Not only with all the research and preparation we all did separately and together, and the collaboration and improv on set, but usually you don’t get to see initial edits and stuff on a project like this.  With this film I got to see several cuts before the final version, which I actually love.  Some actors don’t like watching themselves but I kind of feel like it’s like an athlete watching tape of themselves swimming or playing football or whatever – I like watching it with an analytical eye and seeing what went right and where I can do better.  I’m a weirdo like that!  I will say though, I also like seeing the film by myself first, before I watch my giant feature film sized face in a theater in front of everyone I know.  Just so if something didn’t come out how I wanted I can work through it in my alone time and then watch it in public without feeling traumatized.

 

VOD or theater. Where, if you had your choice, would you prefer your movies – not just this latest one, but all of them – be seen?

I love the accessibility of VOD, and I think in terms of movie watching, it means I’m more open to watching something I maybe wouldn’t necessarily risk trying out in the theater.   But you can’t beat going to the movies.  To me there’s nothing like sitting in the dark with your buddies, with your popcorn, all experiencing the same thing.  I think VOD encourages a solo viewing experience, and I think going to the movies makes it a group experience, so that’s the difference for me.  I think there will always be a place for movie theaters, for just that reason.

 

Where do you think the future is headed as far as film distribution is concerned?

It’s no secret less people are going to the movies, so it looks like it’s headed in a digital direction.  I can see moviegoing becoming more of an event-movie only thing – we only go see the big budget marquee movies in the theaters and we save the little indies, and the smaller comedies, and the more subtle dramas for watching at home.  But that does make me sad.  I think seeing films on that big screen with great sound – no matter the movie, that’s the environment the filmmaker was hoping you’d see it in – you’re seeing it at its best.

 

Do all these extra channels and platforms open doors for actors? More work?

Well it seems like VOD has ushered in this amazing time for television we’re experiencing now.  I think shows that might previously have a more niche audience or might not have rated well on Network Television – the audience for that stuff now has easier access to it.  So yeah there are new outlets, which means new shows, and I also think shows have the potential to stick around longer, which is all good for actors.  And my theory is that it’s good for filmmakers too – there’s far less cost associated with digital distribution than there is with a theatrical release.  So this is by no means based on expert knowledge perhaps it becomes easier for a “riskier” film to get made – you can make it for less money and there’s also less pressure for it to succeed at the physical box office.

 

If your movie was an answer to a question in a trivia contest what would you like the question to be?

What was that great found-footage alien movie that famous actress Florence Hartigan was in? ;)

Beyond The Trek Poster

Beyond the Trek, available on VOD this week from Screen Media, was inspired by an article about human genetic modification, explains writer/director Ian Truitner.

 

Some filmmakers, for one reason or another, are forced to direct films outside of their personal interests or preferred genre. Have you been lucky enough to only work within the genre, and your preferred type of film?

I’ve been fortunate to work mostly within genres that I love. Sci-Fi is my favorite genre, so to have been able to make one was a phenomenal experience. Sci-Fi is the land of limitless possibilities, so the imagination can really run wild without being burdened by convention or preconception.

 

How long did it take to put together the film – in terms of scripting, financing and casting – before shooting it?

The concept for Beyond the Trek began in 2013 based on an article I read about human genetic modification, which, by the way is no longer science fiction but is actually happening. Financing was attached, plus the production company had a sound stage, but since the budget was limited we had to be very creative with how we put everything together. As an indie film, one has to use intriguing themes and suspense rather than expensive special effects.

 

How long has it been since it was completed?

Not long. Beyond the Trek had its premiere at Sci-Fi London Film Festival in spring of 2016, and was officially released in the UK in January 2017 under the title Deep Space.

 

Is the film indicative of your original vision for it?

Yes, very much. There are nearly always variables that force a deviation from the original concept, sometimes creative but mostly budget limitations. However, if one read the first draft of the original script it wouldn’t be much different than the film overall.

 

Did you have to trim much from it in the editing room?

The first rough cut came in at about 100 minutes and the final version is 90 minutes. Cuts were made mostly for pacing, but didn’t remove anything critical to the plot.

 

How much say did you have in how the film was marketed?

Most definitely when it came to festivals. Not so much on the international side as the distributors know their own markets. The name has been changed numerous times. It started as Teleios, but has since been renamed Deep Space, Teleios: Enlose Angst and Beyond the Trek.

 

Do you get to approve poster artwork?

Not approval, but I was asked what my thoughts were. Fortunately I loved the poster the sales rep came up with!

 

Have you been lucky enough to work with a distributor that involves you in the entire process – right up until release?

Screen Media has been awesome. They’ve taken the time to listen to my thoughts and suggestions and I’ve been in regular contact with them.

 

Who did you originally intend the film for and have you discovered another segment or demographic that – maybe even to your surprise – enjoys the film just as much?

It’s a Sci-Fi film, so it’s definitely played very well to fans of that genre. I was surprised that some people found a spiritual element in the film as well. Overall, I’m hoping the film stands up as just a solid film with interesting characters and themes regardless of genre preference.

 

VOD or theater. Where, if you had your choice, would you prefer your movies – not just this latest one, but all of them – be seen? Beyond the Trek had a phenomenal festival run, screening in theaters around the world and winning over a dozen awards. Though I would have preferred a public theatrical release since the film is very immersive on the big screen, I feel the festival screenings compensated for that.

 

Where do you think the future is headed as far as film distribution is concerned?

Currently big studio films with large marketing budgets are the only kind of films that profit from theatrical releases. I hope that changes and there is a indie film revival at some point, but the existence of multiple VOD platforms offering a lot of content conveniently streamed into your home or connected devise makes that unlikely.

 

Do all these extra channels and platforms open doors for indie filmmakers?

It broadens the canvas to allow for more paint strokes, but a big canvas doesn’t necessarily mean the painting will be better. It’s great to have options, but the economics are pushing budgets of indie films significantly downward.

 

If your movie was an answer to a question in a trivia contest what would you like the question to be?

What is the only movie to explore the convergence of Artificial Humans and Genetically Modified Humans?

House On Rodeo Gulch Poster

Having lived all over the world as a Navy brat, William Scherer grew up mostly in the Washington DC area and went to college at the Virginia Military Institute. Upon graduation he received an Officer’s commission in the Army where he spent three years with the 82d Airborne Division as an Airborne/Ranger. Having done theater in high school, his nights were spent at the Fort Bragg playhouse where he had many leads.

Upon leaving the Army, Bill travelled to Hollywood where he got involved in TV and Movie industry. He has acted in movies and theatre with Academy Award winner George C. Scott, Dorothy Lamour, Gregory Peck, Charlton Heston, Carol Burnett, Helen Hunt among others but it was behind the camera that most fascinated him the most. There he was able to learn his photographic craft from some of Hollywood’s most celebrated directors and cinematographers like Academy Award winner, Robert Wise. The first script he wrote, a TV comedy pilot, got him signed with one of the top agencies in Los Angeles and was bought by Universal Studios which got him into the WGAW. He is also a member of SAG and AEA.

Bill eventually relocated north to Central California where he raised a family, and became involved in numerous business and media projects. Having learned to fly in the Army, he acquired an airplane and quickly became one of the leading Fine Art Aerial photographers in the country (See: www.WilliamSchererPhotography.com). As Bill explains. “There’s something fulfilling about shooting Fine Art Photography while flying 100 mph, 300 feet off the ground.” Along the way in his spare time, he set three World Land Speed records on his Kawasaki ZX-14 motorcycle at the famous Bonneville Salt Flats where he went 200 mph.

A movie maker at heart, Bill continued writing and developing story-lines for full length features. After completing the script House on Rodeo Gulch, a psychological thriller, loosely based on personal experience involving a rental tenant-from-hell experience, Bill decided it was time to produce and direct. His vision was to create a compelling independent movie with the production values of multi-million dollar Hollywood production.

The film, inspired by some “tenants from hell” that he knew, is now available on Vimeo and next week hits Hulu and iTunes.

 

 

Some filmmakers, for one reason or another, are forced to direct films outside of their personal interests or preferred genre. Have you been lucky enough to only work within the genre, and your preferred type of film?

I don’t think a Director is ever “forced” to work outside his or her interests in these modern times. In the old days, Hollywood studios had actors and directors under contract and could tell them what to do. Today, an independent Director would be glad to land a picture whether it’s in their genre or not. If the subject of the movie bothers them then they aren’t true Directors. Like an actor, Directors should always seek other genres to challenge their minds and help improve their craft.

 

How long did it take to put together the film – in terms of scripting, financing and casting – before shooting it?

It took approximately two years to write “House on Rodeo Gulch” and casting about three months. I live in a small surfing town called Santa Cruz where there aren’t many actors in the area much less actors that have film experience. Eventually I had to open it up to actors in LA and San Francisco area. The hardest part to cast was the young teenage girl, Shani. I needed a pretty girl that looked 16 but had to be over 18 so she could drive. She also had to have a fiery temper and be a great actor with a lot of acting experience as she was one of the leads. She also couldn’t be afraid of shooting a gun as she was the “Texas State Junior Pistol Champion” in the script. I searched all the local high schools but could find no one close. Expanding my search, I took to the casting websites but found it hard to ask someone to drive two hours for a 15 minute interview. About to give up, I received a phone call from a young fifteen year old girl, Megan Jay Simrell, from Palo Alto which is roughly two hours away. She sent me two bad pictures over the internet and we set up a meeting. Her parents brought her to my house and she read for me. The reading was somewhat rough but I knew I had the girl I was looking for. She had no acting experience except for being an extra in two small films but I knew Megan was a diamond in the rough. She reminded me of a young Jennifer Lawrence with her power, timing and humor. I hired her immediately and now, after having worked together, expect Megan to become a major film star. With the release of “House on Rodeo Gulch” now out, I expect her to get noticed very soon.

 

How long has it been since it was completed?

We had a small premiere here in Santa Cruz on July 22 so it’s only been out about a month.

 

Is the film indicative of your original vision for it?

The film is what I envisioned when I wrote it and am very proud of it. Of course our budget was limited so I had to cut some corners but I think a true filmmaker should be able to do a good job with what he or her  has. The same goes with editing. Find a way to edit what you have and don’t rely on reshooting scenes months later.

 

Did you have to trim much from it in the editing room?

“House on Rodeo Gulch” first cut came out at around 125 minutes. I had a difficult time getting it down to under 100 minutes because I had to cut some of the scenes I was most proud of. They were scary and the visual effects were terrific but in the end I had to ask myself “does the scene really advance the story” and most of the time the answer was no.

 

How much say did you have in how the film was marketed?

Since I am the producer I call all the shots. I read a lot about other filmmakers, how they handled their movies and learned from it. There is no reason to reinvent the wheel. I’ve found that most artists have a hard time promoting their work but having been in sales a number of years I don’t find it that difficult and sometimes even exciting.

 

Do you get to approve poster artwork?

Yes I do. I’ve created two posters for “House on Rodeo Gulch”. The first one was fine but when I went to the American Film Market last September to find a Sales Agent, I spoke with a number of distributors who told me they didn’t like it and told me why which made a lot of sense. My poster was immediately changed and now I’m very happy with it.

 

Have you been lucky enough to work with a distributor that involves you in the entire process – right up until release?

I don’t have a distributor at the time but do have a sales agent who handles it internationally. I’m marketing the film on VOD which is what I initially wanted to do. It’s currently on Vimeo on Demand and will come out next week on I-tunes and Hulu. To find out more about the movie, one can go to our website at www.HouseonRodeoGulch.com

 

 

Who did you originally intend the film for and have you discovered another segment or demographic that – maybe even to your surprise – enjoys the film just as much?

I wrote the script because I like tough women and movies that make you think. I also know that when you spend so much time writing and rewriting a script it has to be story that excites you yourself. I’m a big fan of Alfred Hitchcock and wanted to incorporate some of his story elements. Also knowing that major ticket buyers are 16-24 year old males also helped in the preparation. “House on Rodeo Gulch” was created as a commercial movie and not necessarily one for film festivals.

 

Hollywood movies don’t put enough women in the leading roles and I think they should. I like tough woman that are put in challenging situations to see how they overcome adversity. Since the movie has been released I’ve been blessed with great reviews and many women and even senior citizens have told me how much they liked it. I’m excited that I’m appealing to all age groups.

 

 

VOD or theater. Where, if you had your choice, would you prefer your movies – not just this latest one, but all of them – be seen?

Obviously every filmmaker wants to see his movie on the big silver screen but with changing times and better living room TV setups, that is not the future. If you’re an independent filmmaker and do get distribution, it is likely you may not see any money down the road unless they give you a lump sum up front like at the winners of Sundance. By going VOD, you see the actual number of sales and get the true numbers on what your film is making. It will also be watched by thousands of more people than if it had been played in movie theaters.

 

Where do you think the future is headed as far as film distribution is concerned?

The Studios are hurting with VOD and they are the first to admit it. People don’t want to pay $80 for a family of four to see a movie when they can watch the same film in their living room, have real butter on their popcorn, not sit through commercials nor next to people with open cell phones and all for $4.99? It’s a no brainer.

The Studios know they can make the big budget projects with a lot of CGI and that’s the direction they’re heading. They also know in most movies that “sound is half the movie” so they’re putting elaborate sound systems inside theaters. Fortunately today’s living rooms are also getting better with systems such as 7.1 surround sound.

 

 

Do all these extra channels and platforms open doors for indie filmmakers?

I think they’re great for indie filmmakers and I’d like to see more of them.

 

If your movie was an answer to a question in a trivia contest what would you like the question to be?

What big low budget hit was Megan Jay Simrell’s first movie?

Anti Matter Poster

 

Keir Burrows’ Anti Matter – available in most territories now, with a US release due in September – talks about the film’s beginnings, the ‘interesting’ approach to marketing the movie in different countries, and where he thinks the future of film distribution is headed.

 

Some filmmakers, for one reason or another, are forced to direct films outside of their personal interests or preferred genre. Have you been lucky enough to only work within the genre, and your preferred type of film?

Well, so far anyway, everything we’ve done – six shorts and one feature – we’ve gotten going on our own steam, y’know? I write and direct, my wife produces, so I’m telling exactly the stories I want to tell. It’s not a genre thing I don’t think. Anti Matter is hard sci-fi but none of the shorts were. My next two feature films, neither are sci-fi (one is horror, one’s a drama). So yeah, best-case scenario is I keep making my own films, my own stories. If the opportunity came along to work on something else, a franchise or a pre-existing material, I’d look at it carefully and see how or what I would be able to bring my own stories on.

 

 

How long did it take to put together the film – in terms of scripting, financing and casting – before shooting it?

Anti Matter started out as a short film script called Worm that I wrote around 2011. I never shot it as a short, I had other things that were better or easier to do at the time, I can’t remember now. A year later I turned it into a feature. Then spent a couple years developing the script, looking for finance. Once we decided, early 2014 I think, that we were going to up and do it with our own resources, it was then like an 8 month process, prepping everything, before we started. Remember, we were fitting this in around day jobs, a new child, it was very much a part time thing then. We began filming end of 2014. Taking advice from Chris Nolan, on the way he made his first film, Following, we broke the shoot up into a dozen small chunks – so we shot over almost a year, doing a day here, a weekend there. We did one big block, 13 days, for all the lab stuff.

 

 

How long has it been since it was completed?

Interesting question, I haven’t had that one yet. So… very last piece of footage was captured in August 2015. We had a very rough edit done by October. But then to get to the final edit, grade, VFX, sound mix… That final film was ready, maybe July 2016. We got our distribution deals in place by September 2016. It came out in the UK in July 2017, and in the US September 2017. Long process!

 

Is the film indicative of your original vision for it?

Also a good question. Nice one. It definitely exceed my expectations. I mean that as modestly as I can – we set out boldly, ambitiously, but also realistically. Imagining we would stumble through, it was as much about just making something as it was about what the final thing would be. When we actually had that first cut, and it wasn’t just coherent but, at least we thought so anyway, kind of good, I was over the moon. It had no right to be good, we had no money, no help, it should have sucked. So it’s better than I expected. Beyond that, yes, it’s close to how I imagined it. Probably weirder, more colourful, more graphic novel – than I set it out to be, I thought I’d be making something dry as a circuit board, like Primer. It’s a more strange thing than I expected.

 

Did you have to trim much from it in the editing room?

Yes indeed. Loads. First full cut of the film was 2h13m, final cut is half an hour shorter, 1h45m. That’s quite a lot – and it was only a few small scenes that went, so most of the trimming was taking out superfluous dialogue across the board.

 

 

How much say did you have in how the film was marketed?

None at all! No, the distributors make all the decisions on that, on a project at this level. It’s been interesting. Mostly we’ve been very happy, they have taken our concerns on board. The trailers have been great. But you know, in the UK the main art, posters and DVD etc, it has our actress Yaiza made out to be a robot, when there are no robots in the film at all. And in the US, they had her making skyscrapers explode, which also… isn’t a thing in the film. So it’s been a learning curve. But I’m easy. Fun to watch what people do with it.

 

Do you get to approve poster artwork?

As above! Ha, no.

 

Have you been lucky enough to work with a distributor that involves you in the entire process – right up until release?

Uncork’d in the US have been great, definitely. I mean we’re first-time filmmakers, we didn’t know what to expect, hardly know our arse from elbow. They’ve been great, honest and open and explained the process, answered all our dumb questions. It’s been good. Again, a fantastic learning process.

 

Who did you originally intend the film for and have you discovered another segment or demographic that – maybe even to your surprise – enjoys the film just as much?

I’ll have to get back to on this – film isn’t out yet in the US so we’re only beginning to get feedback, find out who is watching it.

 

VOD or theater. Where, if you had your choice, would you prefer your movies – not just this latest one, but all of them – be seen?

Ha, I can’t imagine there’s a single filmmaker who won’t answer theater to this question. It’s what you want. The big screen experience. If you’re making something for VOD only, it’s not cinema any more, it’s TV, TV movies. If that sounds snobby, it’s not meant as that, getting an audience is better than nothing, by a long shot. But I’m sure we all got in to this work because we love sitting in that big dark room watching cowboys, or monsters, or people fall in love, on a 40 foot screen. That’s where you want to be.

 

Where do you think the future is headed as far as film distribution is concerned?

We’re obsessed with change at the moment, with ‘disruption’ – it’s such an ingrained part of our business culture now that we expect it, we can’t imagine it not happening. But I just don’t see huge change ahead. Movies will still open in cinemas. DVDs will ever more be replaced by VOD but it’s ultimately a similar thing, just a different delivery system. I guess with VOD it’s good as cost to entry is far lower, and your reach is immediately massive, global. The downside being you’re competing against so many others. But if you love film, you’ll celebrate that, good stuff should rise to the top. But my thoughts are, ten, twenty years, it’s all going to be much the same as it is now. There isn’t a revolution on the horizon.

 

Do all these extra channels and platforms open doors for indie filmmakers?

Yes of course – as explained above.

 

If your movie was an answer to a question in a trivia contest what would you like the question to be?

Is there more to us than just matter?